Series: Working Papers. 2612.
Author: Álvaro Fernández-Gallardo and Evi Pappa
Full document
Abstract
Using a novel dataset on U.S. natural disasters and high-frequency measures of economic activity, we evaluate the effectiveness of federal disaster assistance. Exploiting quasi-random variation in whether aid from the Federal Emergency Management Agency is granted or denied, we compare otherwise similar events. States receiving aid recover within 20 weeks, whereas denied states face deeper and more persistent contractions. Recovery is stronger when aid is timely and generous, and includes direct transfers. Pre-disaster mitigation lowers future disaster frequency and costs, while stronger fiscal capacity enhances resilience by enabling governments to sustain post-disaster recovery.